Superintendent’s New “Shadow Policy “Sparks Controversy
School Committee Member Collin Dias has strongly criticized a recently introduced policy by Superintendent Tracy Curley, describing it as a New “Shadow Policy”” that obstructs governance. Announced during a tense subcommittee meeting on Monday, the policy mandates full committee approval before individual members or subcommittees can request information. The decision has led to frustration and heated debates within the school committee.
The controversy unfolded when Special Education Subcommittee Chair Kevin Aguiar expressed dissatisfaction over delays in receiving information about the Parent and Community Engagement Center project. Superintendent Curley responded by stating that she would not mediate timelines between Aguiar and the city, adding that mutual respect was lacking. Dias later condemned the policy, arguing it was implemented without prior consultation and has created unnecessary delays in addressing urgent matters.
Shadow Policy Hindering Progress on Critical Issues
As the Chairperson of the Parent and Community Engagement Subcommittee, Dias highlighted how the new policy has already disrupted efforts to address critical issues such as increasing youth violence in schools and a sharp rise in lockdown incidents. According to Dias, subcommittees, which are tasked with investigating specific challenges and reporting back to the full committee, have been rendered ineffective under the policy.
“This policy obstructs access to essential data, paralyzing efforts to find solutions,” Dias stated. He cited a recent example from the Special Education Subcommittee meeting, where the policy was invoked to deny a request for information. Dias argued that this restrictive approach directly impairs the committee’s ability to respond to pressing issues.
Adding to the criticism, Dias alleged that the policy is being selectively enforced against certain members, creating what he called a “hostile and obstructive environment.” He warned that this lack of transparency could erode public trust and delay much-needed action on issues affecting students, families, and staff.
Calls for Transparency Amid Claims of Mismanagement
Dias also pointed to what he described as financial mismanagement and operational failures within the district, including $700,000 overspent on playgrounds, $6,000 allocated for dinosaur costumes, and a mold crisis threatening the safety of students and staff. These instances, according to Dias, highlight the need for greater accountability and transparency in decision-making.
“This authoritarian approach to governance must end,” Dias asserted. “Our community deserves better.” He emphasized that the policy not only undermines the committee’s ability to function effectively but also detracts from the district’s mission to prioritize the well-being of students and families.
As tensions rise within the school committee, Dias’s statements signal a broader call for a review of governance practices, urging the district to adopt a more collaborative and transparent approach to addressing its challenges.
