Source – www.bbc.com
Review Clears Universities of Lowering Entry Standards
A recent review has found no evidence that universities are lowering entry requirements for international students applying to foundation courses. The investigation, commissioned by Universities UK and conducted by the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA), comes amid allegations that institutions might be diluting standards to attract overseas students, who typically pay higher fees.
The QAA’s review assessed the entry criteria for foundation programs at 34 universities and concluded that there were “no concerns” about universities failing to adhere to their published requirements. The review revealed that entry standards for international students were generally comparable to those for UK students in similar courses. Nevertheless, it noted that international students had more opportunities to retake exams compared to their UK counterparts who take A-levels or Scottish Highers.
Findings and Recommendations
Universities UK, representing 142 institutions, had requested the review to address concerns about fairness and maintain confidence in the admissions process. The QAA’s findings showed that students in international foundation programs performed at an appropriate level, aligning with the standards expected for domestic students in equivalent courses.
However, the review did highlight that international students in foundation programs had greater flexibility with resits, which could impact overall comparisons. Based on these findings, the QAA recommended that universities:
- Regularly assess the progression rates of international students compared to domestic students.
- Standardized assessment practices and rules for international foundation programs.
Vivienne Stern, Chief Executive of Universities UK, emphasized that while the number of international students in foundation programs is a small fraction of the total undergraduate population, the review was crucial for ensuring fair admissions processes. She called for prompt action to address certain areas and announced that Universities UK would update its code of practice to enhance fairness in admissions.
Response to Media Reports
The review comes in the wake of media reports suggesting that some international students were using alternative methods to gain entry into prestigious universities. A report by the Sunday Times claimed that international students were exploiting “secret routes” to gain admission to Russell Group universities. In response, the Russell Group clarified that such claims were related to foundation year programs, which are also available to UK students and should not be conflated with degree programs.
The increase in international students, particularly in postgraduate courses like master’s degrees, has been driven by factors beyond undergraduate admissions, according to research from the University of Oxford. Unlike domestic students, whose tuition fees are capped, international students contribute higher fees, providing a significant revenue stream for universities.
The QAA’s review underscores that while international students have additional opportunities for academic success, the entry standards for their programs are consistent with those for domestic students. Universities continue to maintain rigorous admissions standards while adjusting their offerings to meet diverse student needs.
Also Read: Exploring the Best Universities in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide
